IFRS 17: One Year On – Key Learnings and Ongoing Challenges
Reflecting on the first year of IFRS 17 implementation, we examine the practical challenges insurers have faced, lessons learned, and areas requiring continued attention as the standard beds down across the industry.
Executive Summary
January 2025 marked the first anniversary of IFRS 17 becoming mandatory for insurance contracts. As we reflect on this transformative year, it's clear that while the industry has made significant progress in implementing the new standard, substantial challenges remain. This article examines the key learnings from the first year and identifies areas requiring ongoing attention.
The Implementation Journey
The transition to IFRS 17 represented one of the most significant accounting changes in the insurance industry's history. Insurers worldwide invested billions in new systems, processes, and expertise. However, the first year of live reporting has revealed that implementation was just the beginning.
Many organisations found that their parallel run processes, while valuable, didn't fully prepare them for the realities of live reporting under pressure. The complexity of explaining results to stakeholders—from board members to analysts—has proven more challenging than anticipated.
Key Challenges Observed
1. CSM Unlock Mechanics
The Contractual Service Margin (CSM) unlock has proven particularly complex in practice. Insurers have struggled with the mechanics of unlocking the CSM for changes in fulfilment cash flows relating to future service, especially when assumptions change in ways that weren't fully modelled during implementation.
2. Discount Rate Volatility
The impact of discount rate movements has created significant volatility in reported results. While the OCI option provides some relief, the interaction between discount rate changes and the risk adjustment has created unexpected patterns that require careful explanation to users of financial statements.
3. Reinsurance Contract Accounting
The requirement to account for reinsurance contracts held separately from underlying direct contracts has created complexity, particularly for quota share arrangements. Matching the timing of recognition between direct and reinsurance contracts remains challenging.
4. Transition Adjustments
Insurers using the modified retrospective or fair value approaches at transition are now seeing the impact of those choices flow through their results. Understanding and explaining the run-off of transition adjustments has required significant effort.
Lessons Learned
- Data quality is paramount: Issues with underlying data have caused more rework than modelling complexities.
- Controls need strengthening: The pace of implementation often meant controls were designed in theory but not fully embedded.
- Communication is critical: Explaining IFRS 17 results to non-specialists requires more preparation than anticipated.
- Resource retention matters: The departure of key implementation staff has created knowledge gaps.
Looking Ahead
As the industry moves into its second year of IFRS 17 reporting, the focus is shifting from survival to optimisation. Insurers are now looking at how to streamline their processes, improve the quality of their disclosures, and better integrate IFRS 17 into their management reporting and decision-making.
The IASB's ongoing work on targeted improvements and the expected guidance from regulators will continue to shape implementation practices. Staying abreast of these developments while managing day-to-day reporting requirements will remain a challenge.
How Wizard and Company Can Help
Our team has extensive experience supporting insurers through IFRS 17 implementation and ongoing compliance. Whether you need help with specific technical issues, independent review of your calculations, or support explaining results to your board, we can provide the expert assistance you need.
Need IFRS 17 Support?
Our team can help with technical interpretation, calculation review, and stakeholder communication.
Request a Consultation